Have a peek of a zoomed in Windows desktop. In your Windows Desktop, however, that's something else.
For gaming, you'll probably never ever notice a difference (unless you know exactly what to look for in very specific scenes). However, with very fine thin lines and fonts, you will notice it. Your eyes will be hard-pressed to see the effect of color compression in movies and games. This form of color compression has been used for a long time already, in fact, if you ever watched a Bluray movie, it was color compressed. That I can only answer with both yes and no. All is good up to 98 Hz, after that the Display Port connection runs unto bandwidth issues. While information like brightness will remain intact, the color information will be based on half the resolution, 1920 x 2160 pixels. NVIDIA decided to bypass the issue at hand by applying 4:2:2 chroma subsampling.Ĭhroma subsampling very bluntly put is color compression. DisplayPort 1.4 has too little bandwidth available to drive 4k, 144 Hz and HDR, and thus it needs some sort of compression. A true fact is that it's not the fault of ASUS, AOC or NVIDIA, no the main limitation for this need is signal bandwidth over DisplayPort 1.4. I need to advance that, this screen makes use of color compression at anything above 98 Hz. We're going to spend a full and separate chapter on this topic, as recently it became apparent that in its highest refresh-rate mode (144 Hz), the monitor applies color compression. Out of the box, it's very dull/neutral which is probably more accurate, but not quite what I'm used to or want.Tweet Chroma subsampling - Color compression
I was originally disappointed with the SDR performance, but I just ended up having to adjust it in the NVIDIA control panel to get it on par with where my other monitors were. The HDR looks amazing (only played Doom Eternal so far). The next morning they got 2 more and I decided to pull the trigger. My local Microcenter had 7 in stock, but I waited. I think the G9/G9 Neo or other large 32:9 are only ideal if it's going to be your only monitor or possible one move above it.Īnyway, a couple days ago I was debating pulling the trigger on the PG35VQ. I prefer having dedicated/separate monitors for multiple applications. I have 2x 27" monitors I flank the 21:9 with as well as a design tablet on a movable arm for use with a stylus. I was debating between the Odyssey G9, G9 Neo, the LG850 and 950, and the PG35VQ.įor my use and setup I decided I didn't want a 32:9 because taking up that much real estate, I'd rather have separate monitors. I'd been eyeballing an upgrade from my 2015 Acer X34 for a few months and decided to wait and I'm glad I did. I ended up picking up one of these after wanting this monitor for a LONG TIME.
0 kommentar(er)
